------- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-03-11 09:28 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Rejects JArray<jboolean>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, aph at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-10 19:06 -------
> No, it will not generate the wrong code for
>
> jboolean i = 1;
> i += 2;
>
> You are wrong to assume that jboolean must behave in the same way as boolean.
> It's a Java type, not a C++ type.
>
> Having exact conformance with C++ boolean is not important, having arrays
> of boolean compile is.
>
> The right fix *is* just make jboolean make_unsigned_type (1) on all
> targets.
So you can just revert
2008-02-04 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR java/35035
* decl.c (record_builtin_java_type): Make jboolean a
integer type again where its mode doesn't match that of bool.
2008-01-25 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/33887
* decl.c (record_builtin_java_type): Make __java_boolean
a variant of bool.
* typeck.c (structural_comptypes): Move TYPE_FOR_JAVA check
after TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT check.
then. Still with C++ now reducing operations on bit-precision types
you get different answers for the above case now.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35469
