------- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-27 13:42 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Thanks a lot for taking the time to write a patch for this. I do have one
> question: if I'm reading the patch correctly, this postpones warnings about
> unrecognised options not just for -Wno-* but also for -fno-* and -mno-*. Was
> that deliberate?
Hum. You are right. I don't think we want to ignore -fno-* and -mno-* options
since we don't have a way to detect whether they are unimportant (like we do
with -Wno-* options). I'll fix that.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-27 13:42:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28322
