------- Comment #4 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-25 22:15 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > This problem has already been fixed for GCC 4.3 (#34641). The testcase from > that PR didn't fail for GCC 4.2 so I didn't apply the patch on 4.2 as well. > But > now the patch should be fine for 4.2. I've verified that it fixes your > testcase.
I agree this patch should go into 4.2 as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35311