------- Comment #2 from eli dot friedman at gmail dot com 2008-02-15 18:01 ------- Yes, but "const void" is still a distinct type from "void".
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35210
eli dot friedman at gmail dot com Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:01:53 -0800
------- Comment #2 from eli dot friedman at gmail dot com 2008-02-15 18:01 ------- Yes, but "const void" is still a distinct type from "void".
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35210