------- Comment #5 from fago at earthlink dot net 2008-01-29 19:47 ------- So it is a gcc issue -- seems like it will have to wait for 4.4 then? Easy enough work-around I guess. Thanks!
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34719
------- Comment #5 from fago at earthlink dot net 2008-01-29 19:47 ------- So it is a gcc issue -- seems like it will have to wait for 4.4 then? Easy enough work-around I guess. Thanks!
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34719