------- Comment #34 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 22:23
-------
We should possibly split this bug into two, one for the inconsitencies that
can be observed with accepted asms comparing -O0 to -O and one for the
bug that we reject(ed) "i"(&var + 1) with optimization.
Or declare the latter as fixed (and wontfix on the branches) and turn this
into a bug about the first issue.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression]|[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]
|rejects "i"(&var + 1) |rejects "i"(&var + 1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
