------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-08 17:25 -------
So do I and even am using that patch for quite some time in our gcc packages.
But Mark objected to that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00589.html
The current state of things is bad, because with glibc 2.7+ several valid
programs don't compile.  And this late in stage3 is probably dangerous to play
with two different bodies in cgraph.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763

Reply via email to