------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 17:25 ------- So do I and even am using that patch for quite some time in our gcc packages. But Mark objected to that: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00589.html The current state of things is bad, because with glibc 2.7+ several valid programs don't compile. And this late in stage3 is probably dangerous to play with two different bodies in cgraph.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763