------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 15:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=14879) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14879&action=view) patch prototype
So this patch certainly will ICE in a lot of cases, I wonder if poolifying the inserted code is worth the hassle. It also shows that PRE of loads/stores is probably defect for all but indirect references. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043
