------- Comment #39 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-04 04:43 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] udivdi3 counterproductive, unwarranted use
fche at redhat dot com wrote: >> Downgrading to P4. We seem to have consensus that this is [not] a GCC >> wrong-code >> bug. > > Yeah, it seems to be a mistaken expectation of -ffreestanding not to > call libgcc. Maybe a new option to that effect would help? I don't think there's a practical, platform-independent way for GCC to avoid calling libgcc. On some platforms, it has to do that for pretty basic operations. I think we just need to accept that the libgcc API is part of what's required by the compiler; you could imagine that it is "as-if" weak definitions of these functions were emitted in every assembly file by the compiler itself. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32044
