------- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:20
-------
This code isn't valid. We probably shouldn't allow declarations of
__builtin_va_start, and we certainly shouldn't allow declarations that don't
match the internal definition -- and I don't think that declaration does. (I'm
not sure we should allow definitions of any __builtin functions; after all
they're built-in!)
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
