------- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-12 18:07 ------- Yeah, for both this and for PR 30294, I think we can just reject some constructs very early. I don't think it makes sense to declare variables, fields, or functions with "java" types that are not pointers. The only question here, I think, is whether libgcj uses this construct.
Maybe there could still be a bug for 30293 though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30293
