------- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 05:47 -------
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01456.html This stuff looks pretty good to me: Jakub? The only comment I would have is that this looks strikingly like the scoped_lock idiom on a omp_lock_t. Turning this into a __gnu_cxx::scoped_lock would mean a higher likelihood of exception-safe usage. That could always be a follow-on patch. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33892
