------- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2007-10-10 01:12 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Wolfgang, I think some of this is fixed, and for the rest (comment #2), there
> is another bug report (33490) that is focused just on that.
> 
> Is my understanding correct?

I believe so. In any case, by adding a few std:: to my call (which works
around PR 33486) I can now build my code. I'll see if it also works...

Thanks for your prompt work on all this!

Best
 W.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33488

Reply via email to