------- Comment #7 from jason at redhat dot com 2007-09-24 17:05 ------- Subject: Re: wrong constructor called -- default argument in constructor not seen
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Looks like non-regression wrong-code bugs get no attention :/ Actually, I've fixed several of those in the past few weeks. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5305
