------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 20:26 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This looks similar to PR29970.
It is unrelated. There is no leak of a type here. The issue is we are looking at the type's name which does not exist or something like that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33316
