------- Comment #5 from claumann at princeton dot edu  2007-08-30 18:51 -------
Subject: Re:  [Regression 4.3] bus error compiling dqelg.f in scipy on intel
mac

Great! Will do. Sorry to take your time.
Chris

On Aug 30, 2007, at 12:44 PM, pinskia at gmail dot com wrote:

>
>
> ------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com  2007-08-30 18:44  
> -------
> Subject: Re:  [Regression 4.3] bus error compiling dqelg.f in scipy  
> on intel
> mac
>
> On 30 Aug 2007 18:40:51 -0000, claumann at princeton dot edu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> build_classic_dist_vector_1 (ddr=0x434c3b20, ddr_a=0x0,
>> ddr_b=0x434af898, dist_v=0x7b4d8c, init_b=0x434e9bd0 "A",
>> index_carry=0x7) at ../../gcc-4.3-20070810/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:2719
>> 2719    ../../gcc-4.3-20070810/gcc/tree-data-ref.c: No such file or
>> directory.
>
> This was PR 32946/32573 and was fixed by:
> 2007-08-24  Jakub Jelinek  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>         PR tree-optimization/32573
>         PR middle-end/32946
>         * tree-data-ref.c (initialize_data_dependence_relation): Clear
>         DDR_SUBSCRIPTS, DDR_DIR_VECTS and DDR_DIST_VECTS at the  
> beginning.
>         (finalize_ddr_dependent): Clear DDR_SUBSCRIPTS after  
> freeing it.
>         (build_classic_dist_vector): Return false rather than true if
>         DDR_ARE_DEPENDENT is non-NULL at the beginning.  Return false
>         if either subscript_dependence_tester_1 or  
> build_classic_dist_vector_1
>         returned false.  Don't call save_dist_v before calling
>         build_classic_dist_vector_1.
>         (free_dependence_relation): Don't guard freeing DDR_SUBSCRIPTS
>         with NULL DDR_ARE_DEPENDENT.  Also free DDR_DIST_VECTS and/or
>         DDR_DIR_VECTS vectors.
>
> So can you please try a newer version?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33250
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33250

Reply via email to