------- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-07-24 09:31 ------- The regression occured between revisions 123612 and 123624, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00300.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00311.html The most likely candidate is revision 123623, though I did not see anything obviously wrong. Note that writing HUGE(1.0) gives the expected result: print *, huge(1.0), huge(1.0d0) end 3.4028235E+38 +Infinity -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|testsuite |libfortran Summary|FAIL: |[4.3 regression libfortran] |gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 |HUGE(1.0d0) is written a |on Darwin8 |+Infinity on Darwin8 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32841
