------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-20 16:05 ------- That makes it
foo:
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
movl 8(%esp), %edx
movl 8(%ecx,%edx,4), %eax
addl 4(%ecx,%edx,4), %eax
addl 12(%ecx,%edx,4), %eax
ret
for me. Still different from what you claim.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32698
