------- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 17:58 -------
> Does the patch fix this, please?
Yes, otherwise I would have blamed you in the patch review ;-)
> The testcase that you sent me breaks gfortran
> in other places and probably should have a PR all of its very own. (try the
> FORALL part separately).
I now filled PR 32795; I had hoped it would be something obvious, but it is
seemingly not.
Thanks for fixing this PR!
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31320
