------- Comment #24 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-07-06 12:18 ------- Also, the testcase from comment #21 is not a regression: if we do the inlining manually, it fails in 3.3 too. The failing testcase is:
void f(int a) { register int reg asm ("eax") = 0; a /= 1000; asm volatile ("nop" : "+r"(reg), "+r"(a)); } So I'm opening a new PR. -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2007-05-20 11:20:47 |2007-07-06 12:18:13 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32004