------- Comment #24 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2007-07-06 12:18 -------
Also, the testcase from comment #21 is not a regression: if we do the inlining
manually, it fails in 3.3 too.  The failing testcase is:

void f(int a)
{
  register int reg asm ("eax") = 0;
  a /= 1000;
  asm volatile ("nop" : "+r"(reg), "+r"(a));
}

So I'm opening a new PR.


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2007-05-20 11:20:47         |2007-07-06 12:18:13
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32004

Reply via email to