------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 17:31 ------- I tried this with svn trunk and got 'false'. If there is a bug here it is in ecj, not gcj.
I'm not sure I agree with your interpretation here. I don't see how specificity applies. Isn't that term only used for overload resolution? It's been a while since I was completely familiar with the JLS, though ... where are you reading? IMO the JLS could be clearer here, but I believe the local 'o' shadows the field a.o. See: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/names.html#34133 Anyway, I suggest filing against ecj or perhaps the JDK for resolution. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32638
