------- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-28 12:59 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > core2 AMD > 0m45.215s 0m4.312s (no vectorize)
Ehm, the first is full induct.f90 run on _nocona_, whereas AMD is the result of running the attached test. The table with comparable results is then: (gfortran -march=nocona -msse3 -O3 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse -funroll-loops) nocona(32) AMD(64) 0m4.176s 0m4.312s (no vectorize) 0m8.169s 0m4.668s -ftree-vectorize 0m4.108s 0m4.300s -ftree-vectorize -fvect-cost-model -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32084
