------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 08:03 ------- Yes, I mean performance and size regressions. But your changes to tree-nrv never mentioned you found bugs in it and therefore are making NRV more strict, on the contrary, PR25505 was fixing a performance/size issue where NRV was too strict and your patch was meant to make it less strict, at least that's what I understood from the gcc-patches thread.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32285
