------- Comment #2 from gangren at google dot com 2007-06-12 17:28 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The conversions are not Unnecessary, they are necessary because > short_var+short_var when that would overflow the range of short is still > defined. >
Do you mean that short_var + short_var is defined as (short)((unsigned short)short_var + (unsigned short)short_var)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32309