------- Comment #17 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-06-03 22:41 ------- I am not sure it is a reassoc2 problem since reassoc1 does the same thing and pre "corrects" it. However pre isn't run after reassoc2 so that the issue created by reassoc2 isn't "corrected". Is that possible to run pre again after reassoc2?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32183
