------- Comment #118 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-05-22 18:34 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the dynamic type as it should
gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote: > Thanks for reminding all those points. I'll ensure that I make those > points stand in subsequence messages. I think it's also worth pointing out to the committee that the more aggressive aliasing rules (in which only access directly through a union is allowed) have been GNU C/C++ practice for a long time. I would guess that we made this change around the year 2000. So, there's a large body of code that conforms to the requirements of the aggressive interpretation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286
