------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-18 23:13 -------
> You might just as well close on the basis of your last paragraph. 
> This is really a documentation issue in getting the info to people like
> kernel.org and others writing programs for free-standing  or embedded 
> systems. 
> There are already udivdi3 equivalents in the kernel-tree for a number of
> architectures.
Even if they are developing for a free standing system, libgcc is used for
support  GCC and it is used by every target even the embedded ones, why the
kernel guys want to duplicate this library, I have no idea, that is they only
problem and not a GCC one.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31990

Reply via email to