------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 23:13 ------- > You might just as well close on the basis of your last paragraph. > This is really a documentation issue in getting the info to people like > kernel.org and others writing programs for free-standing or embedded > systems. > There are already udivdi3 equivalents in the kernel-tree for a number of > architectures. Even if they are developing for a free standing system, libgcc is used for support GCC and it is used by every target even the embedded ones, why the kernel guys want to duplicate this library, I have no idea, that is they only problem and not a GCC one.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31990
