------- Comment #3 from zhouzhouyi at ercist dot iscas dot ac dot cn 2007-05-10 04:43 ------- Subject: Re: (different from bug report c/31077 and 29241) C handling of always_inline attribute error and a solution
heh, pinkia, take a look at my solution1 On 10 May 2007 03:41:06 -0000 "zhouzhouyi at ercist dot iscas dot ac dot cn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #2 from zhouzhouyi at ercist dot iscas dot ac dot cn > 2007-05-10 04:41 ------- > Subject: Re: (different from bug report c/31077 and 29241) C > handling of always_inline attribute error and a solution > > Dear pinskia, > If you lookup my solution current handling of conditions > for optimize_inline_calls in tree_rest_of_compilation is obvious > not good. > Sincerely yours > Zhouyi Zhou > On 10 May 2007 03:19:10 -0000 > "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 04:19 > > ------- > > I don't think this is a bug. The documentation for always inline says: > > "For functions declared inline, this attribute inlines the function even if > > no > > optimization level was specified." > > > > That quote is from: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Function-Attributes.html > > And it is also in: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/Function-Attributes.html > > > > > > alloc_null_binding is not declared inline so how do you think GCC will > > inline > > this function? > > > > > > -- > > > > pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING > > Summary|(different from bug report |(different from bug report > > |c/31077 and 29241) C |c/31077 and 29241) C > > |handling of always_inline |handling of always_inline > > |attribute error and a |attribute error and a > > |solution |solution > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886 > > > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > > > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
