------- Comment #14 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-05-06 23:59 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Looking at the testresults, 123629 was ok and 123662 has the failure.
> There's only one libstdc++ change in this interval:
> 
>         PR libstdc++/31117

I told you that at the beginning of this thread, right? Then, you reported that
the portion of 12.cc about *short* type is failing, and that has nothing to do
with that change, doesn't make any sense frankly. Therefore, either something
changed in the memory layout, a latent miscompilation is triggered, or
something else, definitely, nothing I can fix with the info I have from you.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31836

Reply via email to