------- Comment #14 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-06 23:59 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Looking at the testresults, 123629 was ok and 123662 has the failure. > There's only one libstdc++ change in this interval: > > PR libstdc++/31117
I told you that at the beginning of this thread, right? Then, you reported that the portion of 12.cc about *short* type is failing, and that has nothing to do with that change, doesn't make any sense frankly. Therefore, either something changed in the memory layout, a latent miscompilation is triggered, or something else, definitely, nothing I can fix with the info I have from you. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31836
