------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 19:51
-------
I think this probably qualifies as a regression, given Stephen's comment #9,
but not an important one. With all of GCC's optimization options, if we start
worrying about regressions for things outside the {-O0, -O1, -O2, -O3, -Os} set
of options that do not occur with those options, I think we're going to have a
very hard time keeping track of what's going on. So, I have marked this P4.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31130
