------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 00:34 -------
This fixes it and regtests OK
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
===================================================================
*** gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 123183)
--- gcc/fortran/check.c (working copy)
*************** numeric_check (gfc_expr *e, int n)
*** 58,63 ****
--- 58,75 ----
if (gfc_numeric_ts (&e->ts))
return SUCCESS;
+ /* If the expression has not got a type, check if its namespace can
+ offer a default type. */
+ if ((e->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE || e->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE)
+ && e->symtree->n.sym->ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN
+ && gfc_set_default_type (e->symtree->n.sym, 0,
+ e->symtree->n.sym->ns) == SUCCESS
+ && gfc_numeric_ts (&e->symtree->n.sym->ts))
+ {
+ e->ts = e->symtree->n.sym->ts;
+ return SUCCESS;
+ }
+
gfc_error ("'%s' argument of '%s' intrinsic at %L must be a numeric type",
gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n], gfc_current_intrinsic, &e->where);
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-03-16 15:06:50 |2007-03-30 00:34:40
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31222
