------- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 20:33 ------- I missed another gen_rtx_SCARTCH also: Index: gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md =================================================================== --- gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md (revision 123248) +++ gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md (working copy) @@ -10715,7 +10715,9 @@ gen_rtx_MEM (SImode, operands[0]), operands[1]), gen_rtx_USE (VOIDmode, operands[2]), - gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_SCRATCH (SImode))); + gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, + gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, + LINK_REGISTER_REGNUM))); call = emit_call_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, tmp)); use_reg (&CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE (call), pic_offset_table_rtx); DONE; @@ -10788,7 +10790,9 @@ operands[1]), operands[2])), gen_rtx_USE (VOIDmode, operands[3]), - gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_SCRATCH (SImode))); + gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, + gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, + LINK_REGISTER_REGNUM)))); call = emit_call_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, tmp)); use_reg (&CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE (call), pic_offset_table_rtx); DONE;
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31364