------- Comment #2 from gcc at severeweblint dot org 2007-03-27 04:20 ------- Created an attachment (id=13293) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13293&action=view) patch
This patch fixes all the problems in the cheapest possible way. With it the attached testcase succeedds. It does not incorporate the testcase attachment into the gcc testsuite, although that surely ought to be done. (I got confused by the makefile for the testsuite. sorry) Note there are other approaches to fixing these bugs that might be better in the long term: 1) It is plainly bad that vector<bool> has a copy of code from vector. It is likewise poor that each has 3 places that deal in resizing, each of which needs similar defensive logic. 2) vector<bool>::iterator ought to use a 64-bit int for sizes, even in a 32-bit environment, since it could have sizes larger than the pointer limitation. But I'm not positive that that is doable. It may not be possible to match function signatures to vector as needed. The limited size may be best considered a cost of the mistake of making a bit vector a specialization of vector, instead of its own class. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31370
