------- Comment #10 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2007-03-12 13:33 -------
They do all have the (ab) next to them, I was just indicating that they all
occurred in a PHI together, and hence needed to be coalesced. I should have
been more precise.
Well, _t_3 definately does have the (ab) flag, and I don't know what all it
does do, but it does introduce the situation where we have overlapping abnormal
ssa-names which have to be coalesced.
I see it does a bunch of replacements which include _t_3(ab), lines such as:
Replaced (struct *) #ref#17#7_8338 with _t_3(ab) in #ref#17#7.2741_8343 =
(struct *) #ref#17#7_8338;
(Just an example, not meant to be the erroneous replacement). So it is clearly
doing something with it.
--
amacleod at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amacleod at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604
