------- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 02:12 -------
In response to #2, sorry, but the 6.cc test-case passes with r122747 and fails
with r122748 so this regression *is* exposed by your patch; reconfirmed with a
different x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu host as well as a i686-pc-linux-gnu host.
I'm just happy it wasn't Sebastian's significantly larger and more intrusive
patch! I hope to diff disassembly and a simulator trace to see if I can find
something easier to handle than an execution-time timeout. If you're not
interested in that, feel free to assign yourself any time! ;)
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|spop at gcc dot gnu dot org |
GCC host triplet|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |x86_64-unknown-linux-
| |gnu,i686-pc-linux-gnu
Last reconfirmed|2007-03-09 22:12:54 |2007-03-10 02:12:11
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115
