------- Comment #5 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 17:51 ------- Subject: Re: Revision 121302 causes 30% performance regression
Could you attach dumps for fdump-tree-alias-vops-details-blocks-stats (tarr'ing up the resulting dumps is fine) for before and after? I don't have a clean tree around, and it would really help. (If not, it's okay, it would just make my analysis faster). On 9 Mar 2007 17:40:50 -0000, hjl at lucon dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-03-09 17:40 ------- > Created an attachment (id=13180) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13180&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13180&action=view) > A breakdown testcase > > xxx.f90 is the problem. -fdump-tree-all shows that revision 121302 > generates very different alias info. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31090
