------- Comment #26 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 17:01 ------- Paolo Carlini, why did you revert the xfail? That's *not* according to procedure. I really resent that, but please discuss the issue on the gcc@ or gcc-patches@ lists, not here. If it was the extra FAIL lines for ICEing targets, I now know how to limit the xfail using dg-xfail-if. I also don't see any message on gcc-patches@ or libstdc++@ about the reversion. Regarding binary search, I suggest you read the description of this PR. The revision exposing the bug is already identified.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768
