------- Comment #1 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 00:23 -------
I would suggest that your comment about "No check_used needed" should reference
11.2.1 of the F2003 standard. The relevant language is towards the end (p252,
lines 30-34 of the page): "The local identifier of an entity made accessible by
a USE statement ... may be given the ASYNCHRONOUS or VOLATILE attribute."
There is no other restriction on this that would prevent this from applying to
an entity that already has the relevant ASYNCHRONOUS or VOLATILE attribute.
--
brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |brooks at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30520
