------- Comment #14 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-16 18:01 ------- Subject: Re: Integer Overflow detection code optimised away, -fwrapv broken
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | We do weight between cost and result which is a reason we keep branches in | active maintainance for a long time. But we need to focus on where the | majority of our users are, which is gcc 4.1 nowadays. Fully agreed. We must however do something about the integer overflow thingy, because we stillface the needs of our user base. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30477
