------- Comment #18 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-03 17:42 -------
Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
Tobias,
>
> The patch looks good -- and the test cases as well.
>
Great!
> Just for completeness, the relevant part of the standard is:
> "C1209 (R1206) A procedure-name shall not specify a procedure that is
> specified
> previously in any procedure-stmt in any accessible interface with the same
> generic identifier."
>
>
Thanks - I realised that there must be something like this because the
CP2K usage was accepted by other compilers and that it is logical that
it should be so.
> Note that this does not fix everything as gfortran rejects also
> interface_y.f90
> if I comment the "call bl_copy(1.0, chr)"; if I understand the standard
> correctly, the ambiguity is ok as long as one does not try to access bl_copy.
> (And ifort/NAG f95 and sunf95 agree with me.)
>
This is equally understandable. It SHOULD be easy to put this bit right.
> Something which puzzles me is also the error message; one gets *twice*:
> interface_y.f90:39.58:
>
> USE f77_blas_extra ! { dg-error "Ambiguous|interfaces" }
> 1
>
....hence the form of the dg-error above; I was less interested to put
this right than to have it accepting the correct code. This is not
unusual in such errors. Sometimes...., sometimes I succeed in finding
out why!
Thanks
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975
