------- Comment #2 from carl at thep dot lu dot se 2006-11-28 14:07 -------
Ah. newlib. Thank you. I didn't know it existed, but indeed it solves
the problem and lets gcc build cleanly. So much for my googling skills. :-P
I won't be able to actually use libstdc++ since the underlying OS lacks
most of the things needed by newlib, but that's my problem and not gcc's.
I'm marking this bug as invalid. However, judging by the number of
people who have run into similar problems it might be a good idea to
make the error message less misleading (if it's easily done).
--
carl at thep dot lu dot se changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29981
