------- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 23:19 ------- Note that (reg 29) is the ret1 reg.
Looks more and more like a register allocation problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29840
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:19:47 -0800
------- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 23:19 ------- Note that (reg 29) is the ret1 reg.
Looks more and more like a register allocation problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29840