------- Comment #17 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-11-24 00:11 ------- (In reply to comment #13)
> The question I asked is "why doesn't this happen for 'const'"? That > turned out to be a good question, because it leads to the better > question of "what debugging output did you expect for this code, > anyway"? > > It seems to me that __noalias__ is an interesting attribute that > should be somehow reflected in the DWARF. That would require a GNU > extension, of course. Rather than comparing this with "const", compare it with "restrict". This deserves representation in DWARF if and only if restrict deserves it. (and that I can't answer, but my gut feeling is that such representation should be only for things that C++ would put into name mangling) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28834
