------- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 03:55 ------- Subject: Re: DWARF: Not all inline concrete instances are being generated
> OK, so I'll have to find another way of using the DWARF info to see if a > inline > routine, such as __task_rq_lock was used at all in the build or was just > included in the DWARF info but not referenced anywhere, have to dig more into > the available information... > > BTW, if, in these cases, DW_TAG_subroutine is not referenced, what is the > purpose of it being included? Is there a reason my limited knowledge is not > realising? Well, it is referenced. It did exist in the source, and was inlined. That's what we output. DW_TAG_subprogram with no PC range is actually common. Because all the inlined instances were optimized away, there are no DW_TAG_inlined_* entries for them. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29792 > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29792
