------- Comment #3 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-14 01:04 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You should note that 3.4.x is no longer being maintained so this bug will most > likely be closed as fixed as you already mention it works in 4.1.1. >
That's too bad. I am developing pretty heavy SSE-based code, and performance-wise gcc-3.4.6 is the best so far. Sorry, I cant' post the code, but here are performance figures (output of 'time' command): with gcc-4.1.1 -O3: 567.341u 2.098s 9:35.75 98.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 567.055u 2.229s 9:37.18 98.6% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w with gcc-3.4.6 -O2: 543.440u 2.038s 9:13.76 98.5% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 542.925u 2.149s 9:16.29 97.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818