------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 23:18 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > This is a duplicate of another PR where we forget to substitute an > outer template argument in the specialization of an inner template. > I think it concerned a boolean value in that case, rather than a type.
That is PR 14032. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |14032 Summary|specialization enclosed |partial specialization |templates within the |enclosed templates within |declaration of the enclosed |the declaration of the |class. |enclosed class. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29767