------- Comment #42 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 11:41 ------- > Hey Eric. Yes, it looks like I'm all ok (test results are perfect) as long > as HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP is defined, but screwed if it isn't. Although I'm ok > now, it does seem as if something may be wrong in one of the code paths, as > things should still work without comdat groups, no?
Yes, I'm investigating. Ultimately I could always resort to conditionalizing my change on HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP, but that would be more of a kludge. > Thanks for your help! Thanks for your patience. :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
