------- Comment #9 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-11-05 17:00 ------- Subject: Re: subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a useful error.
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:37:42PM -0000, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > How does Intel's iand other commercial compilers handle > > a leading dollar? The standard is quite clear that the > > first character in a name is an alphabetic character. > > > ifort-9.1.xx accept it without any notice. > Why would a leading dollar be different to anywhere else in a name? > IIRC, the use of $ is a Digital extension on VMS. It's been more than 15 years since I used VMS, but I vaguely remmeber seeing Fortran with the $ only in the 2nd position. But, if Intel (a Digital descented) accepts the leading dollar sign, then your suggested modification is probably correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27698