------- Comment #9 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu  
2006-11-05 17:00 -------
Subject: Re:  subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a
useful error.

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:37:42PM -0000, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> 
> > How does Intel's iand other commercial compilers handle
> > a leading dollar?  The standard is quite clear that the
> > first character in a name is an alphabetic character.
> > 
> ifort-9.1.xx accept it without any notice.
> Why would a leading dollar be different to anywhere else in a name?
> 

IIRC, the use of $ is a Digital extension on VMS.  It's
been more than 15 years since I used VMS, but I vaguely
remmeber seeing Fortran with the $ only in the 2nd position.

But, if Intel (a Digital descented) accepts the leading
dollar sign, then your suggested modification is probably
correct.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27698

Reply via email to