------- Comment #10 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-28 23:56 ------- Subject: Re: ICE in gfc_match_common for blank common in BLOCK DATA unit
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:08:02PM -0000, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > Created an attachment (id=12476) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12476&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12476&action=view) > untested proposed fix > > I hope to test this patch soon. > > Note that it adds a warning about blank common in block data but -- unlike the > patch in the previous comment -- does accept the common instead of abandoning > it via goto cleanup. Please advise if not cleaning this up is acceptable or if > blank commons should be ignored there. > > fortran/ChangeLog: > 2006-10-22 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR fortran/29537 > * trans-common.c (gfc_trans_common): For unnamed block data the > proc_name is null, so use the locus of the common. > (gfc_sym_mangled_common_id): Fix whitespace. > * match.c (gfc_match_common): Emit warning about blank common in > block data. > > testsuite/ChangeLog: > 2006-10-22 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR fortran/29537 > * blockdata_1.f90: Add warning about blank common in block data. > * blockdata_2.f90: New testcase. > > Bernhard, This is ok for trunk. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29537
