------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 21:22 -------
I thought it would simply be a matter of using TREE_NO_WARNING ... until I
realized this was not a warning but an error.
Anyway, following the method of the fix for PR19375, I bootstrapped and tested
this patch below, but since this is a language issue and my understanding of
C++ is non-existing, I'm unassigning myself from this PR.
Index: semantics.c
===================================================================
--- semantics.c (revision 117672)
+++ semantics.c (working copy)
@@ -1559,8 +1559,12 @@ finish_qualified_id_expr (tree qualifyin
transformation, as there is no "this" pointer. */
;
else if (TREE_CODE (expr) == FIELD_DECL)
- expr = finish_non_static_data_member (expr, current_class_ref,
- qualifying_class);
+ {
+ push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
+ expr = finish_non_static_data_member (expr, current_class_ref,
+ qualifying_class);
+ pop_deferring_access_checks ();
+ }
else if (BASELINK_P (expr) && !processing_template_decl)
{
tree fns;
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|steven at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29048
